ARTICLE: The Unlawful Killing of Princess Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed

A call to arms to all anti-NWO activist: Resist royal cyber-bullying with all available means

TheRebel.org

Published 08th March 2013

Three days ago, the Rebel Site got taken offline by its hosting firm under the provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. The offense: I had republished the 2011 British documentary “Unlawful Killing” produced by Allied Star, a London-based film company owned by Egyptian billionaire Mohamed Al-Fayed, the father of Dodi Al-Fayed. The documentary implicates – amongst other things – the British royal family in the murder of the couple and its cover-up.

Youtube and Vimeo had already deleted the video a few weeks earlier, forcing me to host it directly on the Rebel Site. Two emails sent to me shortly after by the lawyers of my hosting firm unfortunately got intercepted by the spam filter. In those emails they advised me that they had received a complaint by a London based law firm, claiming the hosting of the video was in breach of their client’s copyrights. Since I didn’t receive the emails I obviously couldn’t comply with their request, forcing my hosting company of 7.5 years to disable the site.

Grudgingly, I deleted the video as demanded to get the site back online as soon as possible. However, I sent a letter back to the lawyers, with a 10 days deadline to provide written evidence that the plaintiff’s law firm was acting on behalf of the copyright owner, Allied Star. I also sent an email to Mohamed Al-Fayed, asking for permission to publish the film. The reply of his office was swift. It confirmed that they had requested the London law firm to make me take down the video. The only reason they gave was that the film had been taken off the market.

It becomes clear, when watching the documentary, that Dodi’s father deeply loved his son and was shattered by his death. Why would he spend millions to produce and promote a documentary on the suspicious circumstances surrounding his death and shortly later take it off the market without giving much reason? The only explanation that makes sense is that he has been put under enormous pressure to do so. Not only has he been bullied to take his film off the market, but the blackmailers made it his problem to prevent others from republishing it.

Personally, I don’t respond well to bullying. I hate bullies and fight them with all available means. Thankfully I’m not alone. In this case of cyber-bullying, resistance is not only civil duty, but easy. Be warned though! It would be illegal to locate a copy of the “Unlawful Killing” documentary via any BitTorrent site and distribute it to as many people as possible. It would be illegal to burn CDs and pass them to all your friends. It would be illegal to upload the video to video hosting sites under its own or slightly altered name. And it would be illegal to create a torrent of your own on BitTorrent sites and share it for other people to download. But it is not illegal, to publish this article, share, email and republish it on your blog, and that’s exactly what I’m asking all of my readers to do. Make it go viral.

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Curator - March 8, 2013 at 7:43 pm

Categories: BANNED! in the UK - 'Unlawful Killing'   Tags:

Diana Assassination 15 Years on – The Jack Blood Show – Wednesday 12th September 2012

DianaAssassination.com

September 12th 2012 Live Broadcast: Jack Blood (still stricken by the CC Flu) reports on the recent Mid east chaos aka, selection Psy Op.

Hour two: Joseph Skelton joins Jack to discuss his research on the Princess Diana Assassination (www.dianaassassination.com).

Listen to and/or download the show in full here.

Thanks to Jack for having us on his show.

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Curator - September 14, 2012 at 6:02 pm

Categories: Multimedia   Tags:

FLASHBACK TO JULY 1997: Marriage of Charles poses risk to church

OUR COMMENTARY, 12th SEPT 2012: We are often tasked with the question of a motive as to why Diana was assassinated.  In our research it is self-evident that there was not just one reason, but many factors to at least consider.

To the New World Order, Diana was a threat not only to the Military Industrial Complex that they control (see her successful campaign against the use of landmines at the time of her death).  She was a threat in terms of undermining the Monarchy and beyond that, the establishment of the Church and State.

This is evidenced in the following article.  It is indicative if not chilling to note that this was published only a few weeks prior to Diana’s death.

As we and others have documented elsewhere, this constitutional mess (i.e. well publicised love triangle of Charles, Camilla and Diana) as it was seen at the time was something that the British Intelligence Services (secret societies known in the public arena as MI5/6) needed to discontinue. 

It is our contention that in June 1997, two months prior to Diana’s accident, an unsuccessful attempt was made on the life of Camilla within the borders of the UK.  See our collection of information on this here.  Following this failure, the contract was shifted over to target Diana by another arm of the same Intelligence Service network.  This time it was carried out successfully outside the borders of the UK, in Paris.

To the shock of the British people, their icon, their legend was now gone and the same people that killed her, span a story publicly of ‘motor accident’.  First blaming the paparazzi photographers, then landing the blame in the lap of the driver, Henri Paul.

To anyone with two brain cells to rub together this was no accident.  Here we look at one of the several motives that is essential to understanding why she was killed.  Due to Fair Use limitations we have not copied the full body article below, however the last two paragraphs are indeed worthy of note in this regard.

 

*************************************************

HEADLINE: Marriage of Charles poses risk to church

Article by Colin Brown

The Independent

Published 19th July 1997

********************

The Parliamentary aide to the Lord Chancellor yesterday said a constitutional crisis over the marriage of Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles would lead to the disestablishment of the Church.

The warning by Tony Wright, a Parliamentary private secretary to Lord Irvine, will be seen as part of the softening up exercise for the public to accept the eventual marriage between the Prince and his mistress, in spite of the denials by Downing Street and the Palace that it is contemplated.

The controversy over the marriage is likely to strengthen the opinion among some MPs that the Government’s constitutional reforms should include cutting the links between the Church and the state.

 

THE ARTICLE CONTINUES…

 

Last night’s party at Highgrove, thrown by the Prince to celebrate Mrs Parker Bowles’ 50th birthday, was part of the charm offensive to overcome public hostility stemming from his divorce from Princess Diana.

The Prince has been seeking advice from confidants on how best to introduce her to a wider public.

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Curator - September 12, 2012 at 1:41 pm

Categories: Motives   Tags:

FLASHBACK: Prince Philip pictured at Nazi funeral

Article by Andrew Levy

Daily Mail

Published 06th March 2006

*************************

Prince Philip has broken a 60-year public silence about his family’s links with the Nazis.

In a frank interview, he said they found Hitler’s attempts to restore Germany’s power and prestige ‘attractive’ and admitted they had ‘inhibitions about the Jews’.

The revelations come in a book about German royalty kowtowing to the Nazis, which features photographs never published in the UK.

They include one of Philip aged 16 at the 1937 funeral of his elder sister Cecile, flanked by relatives in SS and Brownshirt uniforms.

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Curator - June 27, 2012 at 6:08 pm

Categories: Prince Philip Exposed   Tags:

FLASHBACK: Di Told Me She Was in Danger

The Mirror

Published 2003-2004 (Exact date unknown)

************************************

DIANA confided in a royal biographer that she feared for her life just two months before her death.

Ingrid Seward was told by Diana that she felt her life had been in danger, in a heart-to-heart chat at Kensington Palace.

Ms Seward said: “We were having what she called a girlie chat and she just opened up. She told me exactly what she said in her letter to Burrell.

“She told me: ‘I know this sounds silly now, but I did really worry about the brakes on my car’.

“Diana said this to me at the end of June 1997. She was convinced there were people out to get her. We laughed about it. She didn’t tell me who they were. She was quite canny.

“She obviously took it quite seriously and said that she had the apartment swept for bugs.

“I spent the morning with her. Everything she told me was amazing. I was under trust not to repeat what she said.

“I couldn’t believe what she was saying. It was pretty extraordinary.”

Ms Seward, who wrote what Diana told her in an article 12 months ago, added: “Diana avoided saying who these people were who were after her.

“She was trying to emphasise the mistrust she felt for everybody and feeling completely isolated. It must have been pretty scary.

“I knew she was also fearful they would take the boys away from her, and was genuinely worried that would happen.

ORIGINAL LINK NO LONGER AVAILABLE

SEE FULL ARTICLE HERE

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Curator - June 17, 2012 at 5:39 pm

Categories: Just a Coincidence   Tags:

FLASHBACK: Diana’s Fears: Philip Hates Me – He Wants Me To Disappear

Diana feared an attack on her life

Article by Padraic Flanagan

The Express

Published 09th June 2007

******************************

PRINCESS Diana was haunted by fears she would be murdered, and told friends of her concerns about Prince Philip’s animosity to her.

“He really hates me and would like to see me disappear,” she said.

The Princess, who died in a Paris car crash in 1997, repeatedly made clear her belief that she would be the victim of an Establishment conspiracy.

Her fashion designer friend Roberto Devorik explained that the Princess had spoken about how she would be killed in a fake accident.

“They will do it when I am in a small plane, in a car when I am driving, or in a helicopter,” she is said to have told Mr Devorik. He also revealed how Diana disliked having bodyguards because she felt they spied on her.

The article, in next month’s edition of US magazine Vanity Fair, reports how Diana voiced her suspicions on a trip to Rome with Argentinian Mr Devorik.

SEE FULL ARTICLE HERE

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Curator - June 17, 2012 at 5:15 pm

Categories: Just a Coincidence   Tags:

FLASHBACK: Diana death probe: two computers stolen

IOL News

Published 07th February 2006

****************************

Two laptops have been stolen from offices used by a former police chief who is heading a probe into the death of Princess Diana in a Paris car crash in 1997, a newspaper said on Tuesday.

The theft sparked fears that the equipment may contain material from Operation Paget, the investigation headed by former Metropolitan Police Commissioner Lord John Stevens, the Daily Express said.

However, a spokesperson for the Metropolitan said the computers did not contain any sensitive information or any material linked to the probe.

SEE FULL ARTICLE HERE

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Curator - June 17, 2012 at 5:07 pm

Categories: Just a Coincidence   Tags:

FLASHBACK: Diana was warned about ‘accident’

Yahoo News Online

Published 06th December 2005

*************************

Diana, Princess Of Wales was warned “accidents can happen” by a senior politician just six months before she died, according to her therapist.

Simone Simmons has told British police investigating Diana’s death in a 1997 Paris car crash that the princess asked her to listen to a recorded phone conversation with the politician threatening her over her campaign to ban landmines.

She was told, “Don’t meddle with things you don’t know about. Accidents can happen.”

Simmons has passed the name of the politician to police.

The allegations fuel claims Diana and her lover Dodi Fayed were murdered.

ORIGINAL LINK HERE

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Curator - June 17, 2012 at 5:02 pm

Categories: Just a Coincidence   Tags:

FLASHBACK: Key Diana Evidence Will Stay Secret For 100 Years

Contact Music

Published 19th October 2005

***************************

Vital evidence relating to the tragic death of late British royal DIANA, PRINCESS OF WALES will remain secret for 100 years under French law.

London’s Metropolitan Police are conducting a new investigation into Diana’s death following a high speed car crash in Paris in 1997, but their attempts to learn the identities of 24 bodies who shared a mortuary with her dead chauffeur HENRI PAUL have been rejected.

According to British newspaper the Daily Express, investigating officers believe blood may have been taken from one of the other corpses in a bid by secret agents to frame Paul for drink driving.

MOHAMED AL FAYED, the father of Diana’s lover DODI who also died following the crash, is certain the French authorities refusal to divulge information about the 24 dead people is further evidence of a cover-up operation.

His spokesperson says, “We have struggled for years to establish the identity and cause of their deaths. This just reaffirms our belief that there is an orchestrated cover-up.

“Until anybody can prove otherwise, we believe that Diana was murdered.”

SEE FULL ARTICLE HERE

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Curator - June 17, 2012 at 4:59 pm

Categories: Just a Coincidence   Tags:

FLASHBACK: Diana Embalming To Hide Pregnancy

OUR COMMENTARY: It matters not, the outcome of any tests as to whether she was pregnant. The more sensible argument/question is that she was assassinated at that time, because IT WAS BELIEVED that she was pregnant with Dodi’s child.

This is confirmed by several in the media and Royal circles to have been the case.

So it is contributing to a well known ‘straw-man’ argument to say: “…because some test says that she wasn’t pregnant, this proves that she wasn’t murdered for that reason”.

We need to be aware of this element.

**************************************************************

Contact Music

Published 26th September 2005

******************************

Late British royal DIANA, PRINCESS OF WALES was embalmed on the orders of British authorities to prevent tests which could have confirmed whether or not she was carrying her lover DODI FAYED’s child, according to a new investigation.

British newspaper the Daily Express today (26SEP05) claims a top official at the British embassy in Paris was informed just minutes after the Princess’s death that embalming her body would be illegal. But the procedure went ahead.

Professor PETER VANEZIZ, an independent pathologist says, “Nobody should be embalmed before a post-mortem. There is no reason why this should have been done in the case of the Princess.

“There was no reason for it to be done in order to repatriate her body to this country. That is evidenced by the fact Dodi Fayed’s body was not embalmed.

“One would have normally thought that the effect of embalming would destroy body samples if the person was pregnant.”

A spokeswoman for the UK foreign office says, “This is the subject of an ongoing inquiry by Lord Stevens and as such we have no further comment.

Fayed’s father MOHAMED AL FAYED has always insisted the tragic pair were murdered and claims he was knew Diana was pregnant.

He says, “I was told Diana was pregnant. Dodi told me the baby would have been my grandchild.”

SEE ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Curator - June 17, 2012 at 4:51 pm

Categories: Just a Coincidence   Tags:

Next Page »